Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhoads Lucca Capital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:34, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Rhoads Lucca Capital

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article concerns an investment advisor. It was created in February 2011 and was tagged for notability in April 2011. Since then there have been no substatial edits to the article. The article has also been tagged as an orphan and as a possible COI issue (though this is not evident to me). The article certainly does not make any claims for notability. A Google search brings up a number of directory entries and a few press releases, but no independent reliable sources to suggest notability. The references given in the article are to the company itself, a dead link and the company's software - nothing independent or reliable. Emeraude (talk) 12:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Further to the above, one of the people mentioned in the article did have a Wiklipedia article which was deleted on 6 September 2012 - see Articles for deletion/David Lucca. Emeraude (talk) 13:00, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:41, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 5 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. I can find instances of where a member of the company is quoted in an article about investing, but that's all aside from press releases. -- Whpq (talk) 23:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.