Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhoda Alani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:16, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Rhoda Alani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, per complete lack of sourcing on google news. sole non-user-generated and non-press-release source listed is her marriage announcement in the NYT, which I don't think qualifies as RS. Article apparently created by subject (an SPA), who keeps blanking the page. [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 23:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep GS h-index of 21 (although in a highly cited field) plus named chair passes WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:30, 29 August 2013 (UTC).
 * Keep -- named chair at BU certainly qualifies. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 04:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly notable. I have worked on the article to expand it, add references, wikify it, and make her notability clear. (BTW I found multiple sources at Google News; don't know how nominator missed it.) --MelanieN (talk) 16:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * To be perfectly honest, I don't think I searched as extensively on this article when i saw both how PR-like it was, and that the page creator and probable subject had blanked the page multiple times. mea culpa. Thanks for your improvements, too. -- [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 17:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have changed your mind on deletion, you may wish to withdraw the nomination so it can be closed early. (It's not complicated; all that would be needed would be to state here that you withdraw it, less ambiguously than your comment above.) —David Eppstein (talk) 23:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Withdraw -- [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 23:25, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.