Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhodes Bantam (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:34, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Rhodes Bantam
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Relisted nomination from DRV discussion at Deletion_review/Log/2015_July_10. Nakon 02:57, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. No reason for deletion.  Article looks fine, appropriate sort of topic, good enough sources.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources could be stronger, but a search on G-Books shows that other sources do exist. LaMona (talk) 19:52, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: When I disputed this close, I only disputed the procedure, as not doing so risks setting a precedent. Not the best sources, but enough to meet WP:GNG. Esquivalience t 02:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T&middot;E&middot;C) 18:20, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.