Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda number


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 13:11, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Rhonda number

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG with no coverage in secondary sources. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:16, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 02:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Web pages, an OEIS entry, and a MathWorld listing are not enough to add up to serious notability. No Google Scholar nor Google Books sources. This appears to be the same editor that has been spamming many Wikipedia number theory articles with masses of base-dependent original research; see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive/2018/Aug and Template talk:Classes of natural numbers, among others. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:30, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.— Mythdon ( talk  •  contribs ) 07:38, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable per David Eppstein. There's nothing on Scholar as he says, and nothing on HighBeam or JSTOR either. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:57, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. I guess I wouldn't be opposed in principle to having "umbrella" articles that cover a collection of MathWorld topics that aren't individually notable, but that's a discussion for another day. In practice, the content we keep seeing for these only-on-OEIS-and-MathWorld terms just isn't worth keeping around. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. added, still fails GNG. Sam Sailor 06:20, 18 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.