Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda riley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  03:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Rhonda riley

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources other than the subject cited, google search shows no related pages (one unrelated). will381796 (talk) 07:18, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No independant coverage. Epbr123 (talk) 17:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete proof of notability is not A saying A is notable. Victuallers (talk) 23:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unable to find any sources to establish verifiability and notability -- Whpq (talk) 17:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, but encourage the author/editor to search for sources/notability article doesn't establish the figure's notability nor could I find any. It is conceivable that the author could write something much more complete (with references) to help us decide, should he/she disagree.  It is intriguing that this person was the first Marine surveyor, whatever that is. Archtransit (talk) 00:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.