Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhyan Besco


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G11: overly promotional. Primefac (talk) 21:57, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Rhyan Besco

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject not notable. No reliable sources able to be found. I tried speedying it, but the user kept removing the CSD template. – XboxGamer 22408 talk 21:31, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete There is no reason this should be at AfD right now and the prior tag was sufficient. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  21:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , did you re-tag the article? It didn't have a tag there when I submitted this. – XboxGamer 22408 talk 21:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom. I've also given the user a L2 warning about deleting CSD tags. ↅ𝜞 (Contact me) (See my edits) 21:34, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


 * , the user was actually already past level 4. I think Chrissymad reported them to AIV. I tried explaining to the user that simply existing isn't notable enough, but they wouldn't listen to it. – XboxGamer 22408 talk 21:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that - I didn't see the prior warnings when I did mine. I'll rescind my L2 in a sec. ↅ𝜞 (Contact me) (See my edits) 21:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


 * It was tagged when you submitted the AfD. See here. They've also maxed out their warns. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  21:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.