Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhys Bellinge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 11:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Rhys Bellinge

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Author of a couple of scientific papers, but that's about it. Per Monash University, may have still been working on PhD in 2010. Spammy and non-notable.  T RANSPORTER M AN  ( TALK ) 16:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not appear to fulfill any of the relevant criteria of WP:AUTHOR. The published papers would seem to be a standard part of many PhDs, and are not exceptional enough. No apparent coverage in other sources, other than the papers themselves. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 18:45, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not pass either WP:BIO or WP:PROF. Almost nothing in GoogleScholar and nothing in Googlebooks and no other evidence of notability. I trimmed some puff language from the article but it is still basically a puff piece. Nsk92 (talk) 00:39, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Had my own look for sources and was unable to find anything that shows Bellinge passes WP:GNG or any of the subject-specific guidelines that might apply to him. Jenks24 (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. H-index of 2 (WoS) and no other apparent claim to passing any of the other notability criteria. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 14:59, 18 April 2011 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.