Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhythmicru


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:27, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Rhythmicru

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, and very little quality sourcing to satisfy WP:GNG -- of the five sources here, the two that are reliable ones are both local to the band's own hometown and offer no new information that would boost their passage of WP:NMUSIC at all, while all of the other three are user-generated discussion forums or blogs which are never valid support for anything at all. Wikipedia is not a free PR platform on which any band is entitled to an article just because they exist; RS coverage supporting a claim of notability that would pass one or more NMUSIC criteria is required. Bearcat (talk) 03:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Needs a bit more input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Local or user generated sources only. No other sources exist that I can find.  Delete. Fieari (talk) 04:50, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly a vanity page with puffed-up language such as "They were known for their guerilla marketing,[1] live shows,[2] and passion (!) for supporting the hip hop community.[3]. Nothing to salvage here. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.