Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RiSE Microfinance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I'm sorry but the delete !voters make a stronger case here. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:47, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

RiSE Microfinance

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Questionable notability Eeekster (talk) 03:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC) Notability is not what google result gives. If you visit any developing countries, you will come to know, incredible oragnization do not have web presence. If wiki is all about re documenting what is preentin web and searchable by Google then I am sorry, you understanding of Wiki is not same as mine! 115.118.69.121 (talk) 05:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Microfinance organizations should get space in WP. 14.96.69.251 (talk) 10:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not just about the web, but there should be some references apart from the official website to establish notability. Will consider switching my vote to Keep, if any media coverage for this organisation can be presented.--Sodabottle (talk) 11:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Sodabottle, Wikipedia is not about media coverage, it is about knowledge base. In this article, all the data has reference. 14.96.60.134 (talk) 03:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is about collecting verifiable knowledge from independent sources. Which this article regrettably lacks.--Sodabottle (talk) 06:07, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * @Sodabottle, tell me which informatioon you want to verify out of that article. That article has all the reference. I still do not understand what refrence you want. Be specific and tell me which particulr information is not variable ? 14.96.118.98 (talk) 23:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Reference of Grameen Foundation news and MIX report are very valid source of information. You can't doubt on authenticity of information from these source Adi1981 (talk) 11:14, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete nothing at all to show notability through reliable sources notwithstanding the SPA claims. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.