Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riachão (São Bento) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nakon 01:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Riachão (São Bento)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't warrant an article since we have Sao Bento (Paraiba). nominated this article before, but did not advocate deletion. In fact, I'm not even sure we can merge anything. Delete. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:49, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Redirect to São Bento, Paraíba. Two mere short sentences do not make up an article, it's not even worth a stub. São Bento, Paraíba is still short and can easily absorb all information contained in the nominated article - which is close to nothing at all. Victão Lopes Fala! 02:14, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Keep. It appears to be a small village. Also, has nine language links; primary article appears to be Portuguese. Have improved/wikified it a little. -Arb. (talk) 13:55, 9 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. Also, Notability (geographic features); "Populated, legally-recognized places are typically considered notable, even if their population is very low." -Arb. (talk) 14:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Keep. Even though I nominated it for deletion, at the time I nominated it, it did not have sufficient context to clearly show what exactly the village was. But now, I believe it is suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia after edits. smileguy91 Need to talk? 15:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.