Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo González Alfonso


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep. The article's subject clearly goes beyond BLP1E as the award & citation indicate. (NAC) RMHED (talk) 23:28, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Ricardo González Alfonso

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability tied to just one event. Damiens .rf 15:24, 23 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee //  have a cup  //  ark  // 21:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP1E.  Grsz 11  15:45, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Black Spring (Cuba) as a plausable search term.  Lugnuts  (talk) 09:40, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep the award (and coverage of the award the the arrest, two events) makes him notable. The article as it stands is just fine. Hobit (talk) 15:32, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep agree with Hobit above. As well 612 returns on Google news archives seems notable enough. I will be adding content in the next few days.(olive (talk))
 * Strongest possible Keep. Multiple notable awards. The nominator's comments on the article talk page indicate that the article subject is notable for multiple events ("this guy was a troublemaker that had been arrested in many occasions before this one"), and that the subject was notable under standard notability criteria ("he was awarded many prizes and recognition"), raising very serious questions about the good faith nature of this and related nominations. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:12, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep, multiple independent sources establish notability beyond the one event per awards and References sections. Dreadstar  ☥  05:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.