Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Martinez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No argument presented for notability j⚛e deckertalk 01:56, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Ricardo Martinez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is an all-too promotional article about a bass player whose notability is not proven. Besides the usual verbosity, there is nothing in here that suggests the man warrants an article--like solo albums that made waves, particular technical innovations that have been praised in the press, etc. There are claims of having participated on notable records, but those claims don't extend notability to all the musicians on such records. Drmies (talk) 18:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with nom. From what I can find subject has been nothing more than a session player on the listed Grammy nominated and/or winning works. No other notability can be found. Article was apparently created by the subject, and at the moment it is also an unreferenced BLP. -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  19:45, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - per G11 and A7. also fails GNG. the tone of the article is not encyclopedic and is more like blatant advertising rather than an article. the article has no sources. it is not notable in any way shape or form. --72.65.238.157 (talk) 00:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  01:47, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No indication of notability. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 09:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.