Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riccardo Corradini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   seems to have already been deleted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Riccardo Corradini

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a well-presented article, but it is about a sixteen-year-old footballer who plays for the local team in a small Italian town with a population under 7,500. He is evidently a keen lad, who started playing for a team "affiliated to Juventus" at 12, but this is far short of the notability standard of WP:NFOOTBALL, and no notability other than football is indicated. I have already twice deleted this per WP:CSD, but on its third appearance an A7 was declined, and the author removed BLPprod and maintenance templates, so I bring it here. JohnCD (talk) 16:48, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 16:55, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 16:55, 3 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Article fails both WP:BLP for sourcing and WP:GNG for coverage. As well, there is no assertion of notability here -- this is a youth club player for non-notable teams, which does not meet notability standards for WP:NFOOTBALL. — Cactus Writer (talk) 17:21, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and salt. This article has been repeatedly recreated by multiple users (see Sockpuppet investigations/Fccorra -- a SPI page that has remained open for an unusually long time!).  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and SALT. Sources do not establish notability under WP:GNG or WP:FOOTBALL, and a Google search turned up nothing promising. Article does not make a qualifying claim of notability, anyway. Sorry, but this reeks of self-promotion, with pretty obvious socks/meats involved. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 20:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 23:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and relevant football guidelines. Edinburgh   Wanderer  23:53, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.