Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riccardo de Pra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Riccardo de Pra

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced biography of a living person. Does not meet WP:ANYBIO. Basically a resume of an unknown chef, probably himself. bender235 (talk) 20:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - There are many policies that would get this article to speedy, but I'll state only two, per Wikipedia is not a blog and Wikipedia is not a personal web page, but he is a non notable person, whose activity is locally and limitedly known. Eduemoni↑talk↓  23:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, most likely an autobiography, and a non-notable one at that.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  18:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I gave this a fair shot and looked for sources, and just found duplicates of what is on the page. There are two interviews, which are not in depth, the rest is all trivial coverage.  Denaar (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:CREATIVE creative criterion 3 with multiple independent periodical articles or reviews : etc. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:49, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - while the subject appears to be notable, the article is so poorly written and flagrantly violates secondary policies already mentioned that it has to go. Additionally, the article is clearly an advertisement for its subject and his restaurant, and according to what Wikipedia is not we are not here to promote or advertise someone's company. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 09:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.