Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Ball


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. BencherliteTalk 10:06, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Rich Ball

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not noteworthy. --Susiequesie (talk) 03:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete; non notable book wholesale entrepreneur, fails WP:BIO. References supplied appear to be bare listings and notices, not significant third party coverage.  This article appears to be part of a walled garden also including the articles Net-90 and The Page's Edge.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Busy Stubber (talk) 04:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - after reviewing WP:BIO provided by Busy Stubber, I believe Mr Ball may not meet the Wikipedia Project criteria. I believe that The Page's Edge and Anna Currence do, however, though I believe he has also nom'd them for deletion.  Although I pretty much just look stuff up on Wikipedia, and since people keep slapping my hands for editing, I'm inclined to revert back to that very casual role.  And since I already know about those two, I guess I don't care if they get deleted, too.  --SilyOlPooh (talk) 08:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Susiequesie seems to be in conflict with SilyOlPooh. I still support delete, based on this article. --Busy Stubber (talk) 04:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.