Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Costey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Rich Costey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, massive coat rack The Banner talk 22:40, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, never heard of him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoozle102 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 16 September 2013‎ (UTC)
 * Please take note of WP:IDONTKNOWIT. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 21:44, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. He's got articles about him in Electronic Musician and Sound on Sound. And Jane's Addiction thought enough of him to announce that they had hired him; Alternative Press called him a "producer and engineer extraordinaire". Clarityfiend (talk) 01:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep article is way too detailed, and thus promotional, but he has significant coverage, as stated by Clarityfiend. Trimming back to only links where he is mentioned (and referenced) wouldhelp.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. He has received enough coverage, per reasons stated by Clarityfiend. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 21:30, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, by now is is a sourced promo-article with a source for almost every cough. Does staff really need a discography? The Banner talk 01:02, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.