Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Drezen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-27 05:56Z 

Rich Drezen

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Speedy Delete Don't take this personally, but wiki requires that an individual be notable per WP:BIO to be included. Also, creating your own page is a conflict of interest. Djma12 02:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I am also nominating the following related pages because they violate both conflict of interest and notability. Please refer to WP:NOT:

Djma12 02:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Ineligible for speedy as it has a claim of notability. No Google News Archive results, top search result is YouTube. Fails WP:BIO. --Dhartung | Talk 04:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all Can't be speedied. Fails WP:BIO, no notibility shown. Not verifiable outside of itself. And most importantly is blantent WP:COI conflict of interest. Author must be made aware that someone else should create pages about him and his work when/if he becomes notable enough.--Dacium 04:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsourced claims about a living person are unacceptable in a encyclopedia Alf photoman 14:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't establish notability, conflict of interest. ShadowHalo 14:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The closest thing to notability is the award, but that's far from enough.  WP is not the place to self-promote. --TheOtherBob 18:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.