Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Pecci


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shimeru (talk) 21:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Rich Pecci

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Seems to fail WP:ENT. Most of his filmography is for non-notable roles such as Cop #1 and Loud Club Wannabe. His most notable role seems to be his latest one in the film Life During Wartime, but in most of the film reviews I've found, his role in the film isn't even mentioned. Millbrooky (talk) 20:42, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the roles seem significant, can't see any evidence he passes WP:ENT. I also could not find significant coverage in reliable sources of him.  Jujutacular  T · C 21:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — Jujutacular  T · C 21:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - His roles are not significant. Even the role in Life During Wartime is described in the only reference in the article as a "show-stopping cameo from Rich Pecci as a dour systems analyst with an unshakable belief in the rising power of China."  Cameo?  That doesn't speak to a significant role although he did a good enough job to be mentioned in at least one other review here. -- Whpq (talk) 13:14, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Respectfully, one shouldn't confuse a "cameo role" with a "walk-on" role. My understanding is that labeling a role as a cameo is an acknowledgment of its significant impact within the show. Evalpor (talk) 17:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Reply - That wasn't my understanding, but regardless, the coverage of his work in that role does not rise to the level that would establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 18:40, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.