Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Piana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 00:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Rich Piana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Relies solely on one primary reference, does not pass WP:GNG - company which apparently makes him notable does not have a Wikipedia article. -- samtar whisper 13:19, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  14:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  14:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  14:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Rich Piana is really a famous bodybuilding personality but I can't find any sources (besides the one I already added) to prove that. 64.134.64.190 (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak delete Best material I could find is a decent-quality blog post that's better than what's currently in the article. Still not enough to meet notability standards IMHO, but he seems "famous" enough in bodybuilding circles that you'd think there'd be more out there on him.  Perfectly willing to change my !vote if someone finds better sources. -- Finngall   talk  18:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Found some primary sources on Piana:

His competitive body building results from the most reputable body building site online - http://contest.bodybuilding.com/bio/176941/

Editorial ranking Piana as "One of the top 8 bosses in bodybuilding: http://www.likeaboss.com/news/top-8-bosses-of-bodybuilding/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.127.68.69 (talk) 05:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

His Youtube channel has around 600,000 subscribers. Probably proof that he's noteworthy: https://www.youtube.com/user/1DAYUMAY. I think the article should stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.175.159.167 (talk • contribs) 11:28, 24 January 2016‎  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not convincingly satisfying the notability guidelines. SwisterTwister   talk  07:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Searches did not turn up anything to show this passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.