Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Tafel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Log Cabin Republicans. Liz Read! Talk! 06:55, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Rich Tafel

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Notability seems to be WP:INHERITED from Log Cabin Republicans (LCR). Therefore I suggest redirecting to LCR as an WP:ATD.

Although the article claims that Mr Tafel is a founder of LCR, the founding actually happened back in 1977. It seems that Mr Tafel instead opened the LCR's Washington DC office in 1993. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting, I like to see more solid confirmation that there is support for a redirect here, in the midst of this conversation. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 13:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * No particular objection to the redirect, but I don't see that it was tried first as an edit and reverted. Jclemens (talk) 21:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . I thought it best that I get consensus before making such a bold move. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * and I have been kicking around the idea of a PROR--proposed redirection, with a seven-day notice for uncontroversial redirections. This seems like a reasonable case for such a thing, where you don't want to be too bold, but it's something that, if contested, can be undone and sent to AfD. I'd love to see AfD volume for truly uncontroversial things get diverted to the more streamlined process, so we can concentrate on doing the contended AfDs *right*. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I fully support redirects over hard deletion, and yes, I'd love to see a proposed redirect system implemented. Who would it hurt? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect seems fine with me, that way the information can still be found of needed. Should better sources get published, we can either incorporate them into the article or make a new one for this person if needed. Oaktree b (talk) 15:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.