Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Thorne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is a WP:Soft delete. The article may be restored by any administrator upon request. MelanieN (talk) 00:14, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Rich Thorne

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

vanity COI/SPA page. lacks neutral tone. subject seemingly not notable - fails WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER. Rayman60 (talk) 23:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete only 8 results on Google News for his name, all of which are mentions or another Rich Throne. CerealKillerYum (talk) 03:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as visual effects supremo for films including Fight Club, X Men, X Men2, Planet of the Apes, Shallow Hal, I Robot,Alien v Predator he passes WP:CREATIVE. The article has plenty of references already. I do agree with the nom that the article needs copyediting for neutral POV, but it can be improved. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete instead and Draft if needed, there are several works to his name, but this is still questionable for better article improvements at best. Considering he's only the behind the scenes worker, this is still imaginably questionable for solidity. SwisterTwister   talk  21:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   17:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:49, 20 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 17:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - Visual effects "supremo" is still not solving the questionability of independent notability for his own article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment The article is already well referenced, so his notability has been backed up.The fact that he works behind the camera in a less visible role should not deny him proper consideration for the large body of his work, much of it on very notable, world-popular films. Atlantic306 (talk) 04:19, 5 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.