Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Richard (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFSOURCES and WP:NFO. Found nothing in a WP:BEFORE search and no reviews in Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 22:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


 * delete Obscure old film with no notability. Ode+Joy (talk) 23:46, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's mentioned in the many RS obituaries of both Harry Hurwitz and Bertrand Castelli, although said mentions are at most a sentence or two. The American Film Institute Catalog and Variety cover it in short paragraphs. The New York Times ran a review in the 1 Aug 1972 paper. Since it's Nixon, there is most likely scholarly pop culture analysis of it. (edit conflict) Caro7200 (talk) 23:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Review at TV Guide, and is listed at AFI where citations from NY Times, Variety, LA Times, and others are listed. Obtaining copies of those original citations should be easily found online by someone with a subscription. Donald D23   talk to me  00:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 02:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Since Donald asked, I found other reviews from 1 August 1972: Daily News, The Record (Hackensack), The Journal News - then finally Los Angeles Times of 20 October 1972. Geschichte (talk) 17:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the reliable sources reviews identified above such as The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times and other newspapers so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.