Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Alan Fox (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Black Kite 09:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Richard Alan Fox
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not assert notability in any way Moosato Cowabata (talk) 17:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, previous AfD produced only a borderline publication record and no significant reliable sources that were independent of the subject. Jfire (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 19:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete The sources do not upport the article as to notability. --Stormbay (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep 24 published papers in Web of Science, with the most cited being 70, 49, 35, 17 times. A borderline record for a medical scientist. Major hospital. but only Associate professor at the relevant university medical school. I cannot tell the importance of the association.  DGG (talk) 02:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC),


 * Keep Many publised papers in Web of science, that together with his record as a medical scientist and his record as an associate professor of a uni med school seems to seal the deal for me. Twenty Years 08:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Twenty Years 18:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per DGG. The article should be improved using those articles as sources. DigitalC (talk) 09:56, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.