Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Albert (law professor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Richard Albert (law professor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have removed the myriad of primary references, such as links to the person's SSRN abstracts, to try and get rid of anything that would obscure the reliable sources. Right now it appears all that is here, are university news blasts, and other institutional biographical material. I have searched online for RS, and can't find anything substantial. My only question is if the person's ASCL position qualifies them, but by my reading it doesn't. I think this is an example of WP:Too soon, but wanted a second opinion. So I AFDed instead of CSDed for promotional writing (which was rampant on the page until a few hours ago. Usterday (talk) 02:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: I couldn't find evidence he passes WP:PROF. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  18:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete WP:TOOSOON...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as by far nothing here at all for any applicable notability, not convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  07:47, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - newly tenured at middling law school. Bearian (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete He just got tenure, he may one day be notable but is not yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.