Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Allen Smith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to VoteVets.org. Unanimous. (non-admin closure) --Darkwind (talk) 04:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Richard Allen Smith

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Former BLP Prod--There seem to be sources that he is fairly widely interviewed and cited. I added one to start with. But I am not sure that his career his notable, and I would rather the community decide.  DGG ( talk ) 17:24, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to VoteVets.org. Blog authors need more than a single passing reference to be assured as notable... if there are more references, please add them and I will reconsider my position. I'm also dubious about whether or not a blog is notable by being cited, though if it were, the WSJ and New Yorker are high-profile enough that his name may indeed be notable.  bahamut0013  words deeds 15:15, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This seems a sensible approach - his notability is in the context of the blog and he can reasonably be mentioned there with a short bio of a couple of sentences, given it informs his writing. Shimgray | talk | 16:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect per bahamut0013. — AustralianRupert (talk) 15:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to VoteVets.org. Currently, not much notability is demonstrated outside of his role there. I was just about to close it that way but decided to !vote instead. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.