Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Baird


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 14:16, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Richard Baird

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. Fails wp:bio, reads like a resume, only sources are self-published, NPOV issues abound MrShamrock (talk) 13:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Seems to me like this should be a speedy (A7). In addition to nominator's reasons, the article also fails WP:N.  The only reference on the article is an editorial submitted by the subject himself, with the link being to a reproduction of the article on the subject's commercial web site.  Based on the creator's username, this also seems like an autobiography and therefore brings up more concerns per WP:AUTO.  --Aka042 (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete (A7) - Whilst the article goes into great detail about the achievements of this guy, none of the claims actually amounts to a claim to notability Mayalld (talk) 13:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As per. Ddawkins73 (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  01:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete not for an encyclopedia, nn...Modernist (talk) 04:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.