Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Barbary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Richard Barbary

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable, I am unable to find sources Sonofstar (talk) 12:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sonofstar (talk) 12:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Sonofstar (talk) 12:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sonofstar (talk) 12:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Insignificant, and the article makes no serious pretence to claim otherwise.  Athel cb (talk) 12:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep my understanding is that if someone signed to a major label and released an album with A&M and was all over Billboard 1968 then they were significant in 1968 ... note from Billboard "as Creed Taylor month, with three albums set for national exploitation. The promotion ... Taylor's forthcoming LP releases will encompass titles by the late Wes Montgomery and singers Tamiko Jones and Richard Barbary. " Are we deleting simply because it was 1968? If readers will benefit from erasing record of this singer and his album then redirect to Creed Taylor. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Being signed by a major label is important, but if the signing turns out to flop it's not really notable. Did any of his works chart? What you have cited above are simply industry trade announcements. They were as much standard, run of the mill in 1968 as they are in 2021. I think we need more evidence of significant coverage or recognition. It might exist, but nothing has been presented yet. ShelbyMarion (talk) 20:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject is barely covered by references fails WP:GNG. Purosinaloense (talk) 08:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete With only one album on major label and no charting success, does not meet WP:MUSICBIO, very few citations.Peter303x (talk) 00:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.