Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Bevan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 10:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Richard Bevan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Attempted to speedy delete for lack of notability, editor removed. Is Richard Bevan notable? Samuel Tarling (talk) 10:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator at the request of User:Philafrenzy Samuel Tarling (talk) 10:47, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, he is. Completely premature attempt at deletion. It was created a few minutes ago; it is clearly under construction...Zigzig20s (talk) 10:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Could you please explain to me why he is notable? Currently, he just seems to be 'another person'. Please see the notability criteria for people. Samuel Tarling (talk) 10:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you give us breathing space, yes. I've never seen a page go to AFD a few minutes after its creation--you really should let editors improve the page first.Zigzig20s (talk) 10:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * By all means continue editing the page. I don't enjoy removing content from Wikipedia, and I honestly and sincerely would like to see this article kept and this AfD shut down (and myself proven completely wrong!). Samuel Tarling (talk) 10:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Nonsense, you AFd'd it in a fit of pique because Edwardx removed your speedy tag. Both the speedy and this AFD are premature. Please withdraw your nomination and let the creator do his job. If you still feel it is not notable in 7 days, AFD it then. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I disagree with your reasoning as to why I AfD'd the article, but I will concede and withdraw the nomination. Samuel Tarling (talk) 10:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, that is very gracious of you. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.