Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Boutwell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  22:27, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Richard Boutwell

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage in independent sources found. Being a general is not considered sufficient for notability in the absence of coverage in RS. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  06:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  06:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  06:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  06:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The Greenville Standard is his hometown paper and had a fairly detailed article about him in 2017 when he was promoted to BG. There are a number of articles about various highlights in his career, new promotions and postings, and a more detailed article in the Las Vegas Sun in 2014, as well as this article in the Greenville Advocate. The Greenville ones are local papers to be sure, but there is a fair bit available from the USAF in his bio here (I know there is an argument here about what constitutes independence from the subject, but the USAF is not controlled by Boutwell, so what it publishes about him is at arm's length from he himself - ie the subject) and USAF/aviation-related journals and magazines, as well as snippets on career highlights in various news articles. I would have thought there was a potential B-Class article here with a bit of effort. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:03, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep fails WP:BASIC on existing sources which are PRIMARY in that USAF is writing about one of its own. Just being a General is not a pass on notability. Stories found by Peacemaker67 just barely bring this up to BASIC. Mztourist (talk) 14:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.