Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard C. Longworth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kevin (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Richard C. Longworth

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable scribe Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  03:30, 6 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:23, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Clearly notable.  Numerous references under "Richard Longworth" eg .  Why do deletionists waste other people's time  and effort instead of doing a bit of basic research and contributing to the net value of knowledge in Wikipedia? Opbeith (talk) 12:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I've expanded some of the information about Longworth's purportedly "non-notable" activities (notability obvious from a slight glance at the references). If anyone has the energy and inclination they could disambiguate this Richard Longworth from the other Richard W. Longworth whose article bears the Richard Longworth title. That would be a rather more effective use of time than proposing unread articles for deletion. Opbeith (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Change of opinion - might as well delete. He seems to reckon that his biographical material is copyright, even information that he circulates for use at other sites.  Opbeith (talk) 18:50, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.