Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard C. Onwuanibe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Richard C. Onwuanibe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article with no evidence of notability. Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. This seem like a WP:RESUME. I think it's necessary to remind the article creator that Wikipedia is not a place to publish their resume. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 07:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I wrote the article as O. is oftenly cited in 'Tradtional African Medicine'.--Bussakendle (talk) 11:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC). There were 35 visits within two days time.--Bussakendle (talk) 12:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC). There were 86 visits within three days time.--Bussakendle (talk) 06:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  13:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  13:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  13:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The author should bear in mind that the number of visits over the last three days, which he cites, is more than likely fellow editors such as myself being invited to view the page to pass comment and judge whether it warrants deletion rather than evidence of a groundswell of public interest. As it stands the page is no more than a curriculum vitae or resume and the citations are not being used to prove notability but merely to establish what year he was born, what junior seminary he attended or in which city he now lives. I'd suggest the author takes the opportunity whilst the page is being discussed to re-write it in order to establish why he thinks the subject is notable enough to have a dedicated Wikipedia page and use sources and citations to re-enforce the claim of notability rather than just prove basic school and residency claims. If the page is not drastically improved I'd advocate Delete Pupsbunch (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, your assumption, the visitor count was mostly by critics, does not fit. The number 86 is on user visits only. The overall clicks were 238 in these 3 days.
 * https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/#project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=all-agents&start=2016-03-05&end=2016-03-24&pages=Richard_C._Onwuanibe
 * Nevertheless, I agree to Your request for more information. I'll do my best.--Bussakendle (talk) 09:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- I do not see anything in his CV to point to notability. He has been a professor only in the American sense. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.