Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Chilton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:01, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Richard Chilton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

References are Trivial at best and article verges on advertising. Fails WP:BIO YoginiukYoginiuk (talk) 08:16, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 16.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 08:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep - AFD created by editor in an attempt to WP:HOUND - User:Yoginiuk has been banned for a period of one week for hounding. Nonsensical reasoning for AfD in description.   red dog six  (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, looks like a AFD out of spite. besides that I had no problem finding sources on this one. It's a new stubby article but room is ample for expansion. Sportfan5000 (talk) 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The article in its current version doesn't really state a case for the subject's notability. Forbes has him at #1075 on the worlds' richest list . Pretty much, all American billionaires have coverage and it looks like there's some here, but it would be desirable for the article to make clearer what's actually notable about him. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.