Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Crighton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yunshui 雲 水 12:24, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Richard Crighton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article serves no benefit for the collective knowledge of Wikipedia. Appears to be written solely for narcissism or for advertising purposes. The article is an orphan.
 * Comment - I completed the nomination for IP 98.160.201.240. ansh666 22:42, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as unremarkable individual, a small amount of strictly local hits as could be expected of a businessman but nothing substantial. Article the single edit by a new account, a classic vanity article characteristic.TheLongTone (talk) 23:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete I wouldn't go as far as speedy deletion just because there is some material backing the page, but there's really no clear indication of notability here besides maybe on a minor local scale. Ducknish (talk) 21:54, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete local developer who has not done anything of note. The listed value of property is not that big when talking about commercial real estate.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.