Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard D. Feinman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Guy (Help!) 19:36, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Richard D. Feinman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Finding lots of self-promotion and interviews but little or nothing independent about him. EEng 01:15, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

NOMINATION WITHDRAWN per Xxxaaaannnttthhhiiipppeee. My mistake. EEng 04:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Self promotional bio. Just spent a while looking, serious lack of reliable sources that mention him. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 01:32, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  01:52, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  01:52, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  01:52, 11 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. 20 papers with over 100 cites each in GS passes WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC).
 * If you're sure of that I'll withdraw the nomination. EEng 02:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * My basis was this, which I assume were his. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC).


 * Weak keep, although we may be better off blowing it up and starting over. The article needs some serious work, but it does appear to satisfy WP:PROF. Brad  v 🍁 02:36, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:PROF as explained in the votes above. Thsmi002 (talk) 03:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.