Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Dawkins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy keep Kotepho 18:34, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Richard Dawkins
Reason why the page should be deleted


 * Speedy keep. No reason given, obviously an important figure. I'm just listing this properly so this mess created by an anon who's purposes are unclear can get cleaned up.  NickelShoe (Talk) 16:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. We're on the verge of taking this to FAC so I doubt very much this should be deleted. Clear bad faith nomination. Mi kk er (...) 16:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Dawkins's contributions to science and religion are vastly notable whether you agree with them or not. Someone have an axe to grind? Nutjob 17:11, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep no reason given for AfD.--Isotope23 17:34, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, either a bad faith nomination or a particularly annoying test. Average Earthman 17:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, subject is an eminent scientist and popularizer of science. You might as well delete Carl Sagan. Tex 18:07, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.