Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Freeman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per consensus (closed by non-admin). RMHED (talk) 19:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Richard Freeman

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Autobiographical, and use of sockpuppetry to make it look like it is not. UtherSRG (talk) 16:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Has received sufficient coverage in newspapers. Conflict of interest is not a reason to delete the article; it's a reason to improve it. If Freeman himself remains a problem, he can be blocked. Zagalejo^^^ 22:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I am Richard Freeman. I didn't write this Jon Downes did. I have only added a few things. My ISBN numbers are Dragons:More than a Myth 0-9512872-9-x and Explore Dragons1 872883 93-1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.240.86 (talk) 12:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Soft Keep I actually just cleaned up the formatting of this article just so I could make sense of it. It certainly needs a lot of work, but he's apparently a published author (though ISBNs would be nice) and holds a notable position within a documented organization. -Verdatum 22:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per news coverage.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Zagalejo. Twenty Years 15:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep No valid reason for deletion given, sockpuppetry a breach of user policy, not content policy. Any action should be taken against the individual not the pages that they have edited. - perfectblue (talk) 20:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.