Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Garvie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  19:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Richard Garvie

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable figure. This is someone who aspires to be a racing driver Forcedtocreateanaccount (talk) 17:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete An autobiography and/or Made-up gibberish. A random earlier version of this page even uses itself as a reference. It seems to mostly be madeup nonsense/an attempt at a sandbox page because of its creator's several unreferenced, random edits to the page which change the subject from a race car driver to a pornographic actor and back again. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 18:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Reading the edit history makes me think this article is primarily a coatrack for an attack page. David in DC (talk) 18:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Interestingly, it started out as a puff piece favorable to the subject. So favorable, in fact, that some of its text was a press release with "XXXXX" in several places where important information was not yet filled in.  It reads like it might have been self-penned, or penned by the subject's publicist.  The editor's user name is similar to the name of the subject's purported team. But it became a place for editors of an opposite opinion to dump unsourced, highly derogatory material.  There's an object lesson here somewhere, I'm sure of it. David in DC (talk) 18:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment This proposal is sensible and a good interpretation of the facts.
 * Comment This entry in its original form was giving a false impression as to the stature of the subject. On that basis, commerce was conducted and resulted in fraud and could continue to do so.  That is the reason why the entry should be a Strong Delete".
 * Speedy delete. Some local feud, has no place in Wiki. M0RD00R (talk) 20:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Regardless of the motivations of any editors, the article is unsourced and only talks about what he plans to do sometime in the future. If he wins the auto race then maybe write an article on him. Redddogg (talk) 20:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete without all the stupid crap, there is no assertion of notability. JuJube (talk) 23:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:BIO (all counts) and WP:RS (for not having any!) -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 10:21, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 'Delete vanity--DuckFan88 (talk) 10:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.