Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Gooch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Pascal.Tesson 23:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Richard Gooch

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No real assertion of notability. Just one of many people that has worked on Linux and there doesn't include any justification for this person having an article. Currently a substub, I can't see how this can be expanded into a decent biographical article. violet/riga (t) 08:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  16:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Linux as a whole is a major work that is part of the enduring record of its field, and Gooch's contributions to it are widespread.  But none of them are particularly important, as far as I can see.  Devfs was a major user-visible feature, but it was replaced fairly quickly.  Other contributions are minor: obscure features, or small performance improvements.  No reliable independent sources that I can find with a brief search. JulesH 16:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep based on google scholar hits Corpx 02:02, 26 July 2007 (UTC) &mdash;An external link was removed from the preceding comment in order to avoid a strange spam blacklist rule. &mdash;gorgan_almighty 14:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The google hits are not very convincing, and the article itself is a complete and total WP:BLP violation with absolutely nothing in the way of non-trivial reliable sources, just a personal homepage.  Burntsauce 17:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The notability of DevFS is WP:NOTINHERITED by it's author, and there's no other assertion of notability here. &mdash;gorgan_almighty 14:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.