Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard H. Griffiths (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 18:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Richard H. Griffiths
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was deleted via AfD a couple of months ago. This version is slightly expanded in content but still does not meet criteria of WP:GNG or WP:BIO. He is mentioned only trivially in the references provided, other claims are not referenced at all, and I cannot find other significant discussion of the individual. ... disco spinster   talk  16:51, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 04:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 04:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 04:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 04:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. The article attempts to claim notability by association without any in-depth sources about the subject or his work or other evidence of actual notability. Repeated re-creation calls for protection. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt per the above. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Sources are not substantively enough about him to get him over WP:GNG, and nothing claimed in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the sources from having to get him over GNG. Bearcat (talk) 00:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete we already did so once this year.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.