Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Holton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Richard Holton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable as sources can't be found. As is often the case with commercial artists, the page is basically used as an ad for his interior design company. Per our policies on advertising, I think the standard for inclusion here should be quite high. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not Notable at this time Thegooduser   Let's Chat  🍁  20:15, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as promo. The creator of the article, User:Anthonyn000 has a user page that is a biography of Anthony Niehaus, who is a partner in Holton Interiors. In the article/user page he is listed as Partner and Director of Sales. Vexations (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * There is material here on the Batterymarch Building that ought to be merged to Custom House District (or to an article on that notable building) if this article is not kept. The same is likely true of Casa Coral by John Volk, which is said to be a designated landmark. James500 (talk) 07:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.