Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Johnstone-Scott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.. Michig (talk) 07:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Richard Johnstone-Scott

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable person Amisom (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Total lack of sources to demonstrate anything that is claimed is accurate let alone noted.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and I wish I had caught his one before the relist, nothing at all for any basic minimal notability, certainly nothing new to suggest better information regarding any notability of course. Nothing else to suggest there's anything else beyond the apparent event. SwisterTwister   talk  04:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


 * delete he is notable for being a zookeeper at a zoo where a freak accident occurred. I do get hits on a news archive search, but every one of tehm, different years, different reports, consisted of essentially the same as this form the Globe & Mail: "his keeper, Richard Johnstone- Scott, said by telephone."  E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.