Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Keith Latman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Richard Keith Latman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual. Borders on vanity page. References are lacking substance and are mostly quotes, about companies (not individual), or PR related. Article extensively edited by COI. red dogsix (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the reasons stated above.&#42;Treker (talk) 16:33, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  16:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  16:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Too promotional.  The vast majority of sources seem to be about Microworkz and its troubled history, not biographical details about Latman.  One of the sources, this interview from Bloomberg, actually is about him, but I notice that the fact he pleaded guilty to bankruptcy fraud is missing from this Wikipedia article.  Yes, it would be simple enough to add that line to it, but the whole thing would need to be rewritten, anyway, to get rid of the promotional tone.  For a questionably notable person, it's better to have no article than a promotional one. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.