Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard L. Welch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  | Talk 02:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Richard L. Welch

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This pseudoscience article should be deleted because it has no reliable sources, and no reliable sources exist as far as I can tell. Looie496 (talk) 02:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. (I had listed it as spam for speedy). Pseudoscience, promotional, original research, and no independent references. No evidence of notability.--Dmol (talk) 02:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment When I removed the speedy tag, i notified the author to add some references. DGG (talk) 03:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Real scientists have references galore. -- BlueSquadron Raven  19:21, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Essentially an advert for a fringe science-based training course without reliable third party references. Anaxial (talk) 21:09, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.