Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Latendresse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 20:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Richard Latendresse

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism,  and Canada. UtherSRG (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. As always, journalists are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to show some evidence that their notability has been externally validated by sources other than their own employers — coverage about them, analysis about their work, properly sourced evidence that they've won or been nominated for notable journalism awards, etc. But as usual for bad articles about journalists, this is written like somebody just tried to paraphrase his staff profiles on the self-published websites of his own employers, cites absolutely no third-party sourcing independent of said staff profiles, and claims absolutely nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable without WP:GNG-worthy coverage to support it. Bearcat (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, not seeing sufficient significant coverage. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 00:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.