Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Lints


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JohnCD (talk) 15:16, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Richard Lints

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article was deproded without the concern being addressed, hence we are at AfD. It still appears to fail WP:ACADEMIC. I have been unable to find reliable sources to satisfy the notability requirements for an academic. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 03:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 16:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep?. A few cites and references is a very low cited field. Named chair may pass WP:Prof if institution is major enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly and unambiguously passes WP:Prof. Gordon–Conwell Theological Seminary is certainly a "major institution", if that phrase is to have any meaning. StAnselm (talk) 00:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:PROF #5. -- 202.124.74.145 (talk) 01:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.