Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Little (inventor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  04:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Richard Little (inventor)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

BLP doesn't seem to meet WP:NBIO- the individual (rather than the companies) lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:20, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Unfortunately, not enough notability present as of now. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 22:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Engineering,  and New Zealand.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability, if any, is for the companies not the individual, so fails GNG. Also note the article creator is a SPA which suggests COI. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 09:09, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete There is insufficient notability for the subject. In addition, it meets criterion number 4 of WP:DEL-REASON as in its current form, it's just an advertisement for the subject's business activities.  Schwede 66  09:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Significant coverage of the subject in and . Promotional issues in such a short article can be easily fixed. ~Kvng (talk) 14:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello Kvng. Those two articles are interview-based and therefore aren't independent coverage. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:00, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * There's a difference between interview-based and an interview. But even a straight-up WP:INTERVIEW may contain some WP:SECONDARY material if the introduction is comprehensive enough. There are some sources cited here that are interviews or only mention the subject in the context of a quote, said Little. The two I've listed here do go further than that. ~Kvng (talk) 14:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete pure not hidden advertisement. --多少 战场 龙 (talk) 13:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - New Zealand's business and innovation landscape is small with companies such as Rocket Lab, Xero, Exsurgo and Rex Bionics gaining public interest as high profile enterpreneur-led organisations. Sunshineyellow2014 (talk) 08:04, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note for the closer: this is the first and only edit of this account.  Schwede 66  08:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete The article content is almost entirely about the company and its products, not the person. The notability of the person has not been sufficiently established. --Marshelec (talk) 05:08, 5 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.