Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard M. Flood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:17, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Richard M. Flood

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Lack of notability. The text says he was a US political prisoner, a very dubious claim, but doesn't make it clear why he was one, or offer any evidence. There's nothing else on the page as notable as that, i.e. even if he is a retired union organiser, a perceptive essayist, etc. that hardly makes him notable. And there are no third party references for any of this, just a link to a essay and a dead link. Google only seems to find this page and the two links. JohnBlackburne (talk) 03:58, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete — Way too many issues to even consider keeping. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 05:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-neutral in the extreme, totally one-sided. (Presumably he was convicted of something, but the article makes no mention of that.) Nothing to establish notability. No sources or references. --MelanieN (talk) 18:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)MelanieN
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.