Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard M Holmes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 21:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Richard M Holmes

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

BLP for someone who does not meet notability requirements.  Random Time  03:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect to IncaGold as a plausible search term. Otherwise, none of the content in the article is verifiable, as MobyGames (or Softpedia, which I also came across in my search for something on him) are not reliable sources. –MuZemike 21:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If IncaGold gets deleted per Articles for deletion/IncaGold, then I'll change to delete. –MuZemike 00:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is sourced on flotation documentation which by definition is verified and available from the stock-exchange. Three number one hits and hundreds of games sold, that notable. Also this is one of the most notable Swiss in the games industry. genevoise1291 19:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC) — genevoise1291 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep Three of the best games of 1994 - definite keep! highscorejunky 20:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC) — highscorejunky (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Note to closing admin – Per Sockpuppet investigations/Incagold richard:
 * User:Highscorejunky, User:Todosjogos, and User:Genevoise1291 are ✅ to be the same person.
 * User:Incagold richard is to the same as the above.

–MuZemike 09:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Which notability guideline to look at? As a game designer, perhaps WP:CREATIVE? Have his works "won significant critical attention"? AFAICT, none of the games he is credited with on MobyGames qualify for this. Holmes does not appear to meet the WP:GNG either (significant, independent coverage). Marasmusine (talk) 15:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This smells of self-promotion.  I see primary sources and MobyGames links.  The MobyGames links are about as useful as IMDb (interpret that however you wish).  The bottom line is there isn't any non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications here, thus the person is failing basic WP:BIO guidelines.  JBsupreme (talk) 07:58, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to IncaGold. The article shows no independent WP:RS covering the subject, nor I can find ones. Happy to change !vote, as usual, if evidence of notability comes out. -- Cycl o pia talk  15:14, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of 3rd party coverage. Name, as used in title, is not a very likely search term, so skip redirect. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.