Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Morley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. "Fangwillripoffacertainuserstinywoodanddigestitinminutes" has been blocked (talk • edit talk • message • contribs • block log • change block settings • watch).  MBisanz  talk 03:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Richard Morley

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Author, does not seem to pass WP's notability guidelines - one book listed on Amazon but not covered by any reliable sources, unreferenced article Richard Hock (talk) 14:48, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't have anything reliable either.  Grsz  11  16:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonnotable selfpublished author ("Exposure Publishing" is a selfpublish imprint). NawlinWiki (talk) 17:07, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for the lack of verifiability. (self-published books can be notable, this one just doesn't happen to be one of them). Also, slap the creator with a fish for using the term "fictional novel". This shows a complete and utter newbieness to the world of writing. Novels are by definition fiction. - Mgm|(talk) 19:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N. &mdash; neuro(talk) 03:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.