Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Murrian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Richard Murrian

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seemingly NN photographer failing WP:BIO and WP:GNG. That his photographs have been published in no way satisfies any of WP:ARTIST criteria. Failed WP:CSD. Toddst1 (talk) 19:33, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom as non-notable. This is promotional.  --Lockley (talk) 05:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * delete does not meet GNG. Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Fails all criterias of WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Google News gives: No results found for "Richard Murrian". If there subject were notable, one would expect at least something, however crappy. Mduvekot (talk) 15:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm not seeing evidence of sources counting towards GNG in a quick Google search. The article also is deficient in this regard. Carrite (talk) 13:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, as argued above. -- Hoary (talk) 22:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.